With A 6-3 Expected Majority, Next Supreme Court Positioned To Suspend Progressive Gains

By Leonard E. Colvin
Chief Reporter
New Journal and Guide

The 1876 presidential election ended with Republican Rutherford B. Hayes and Democrat Samuel J. Tilden deadlocked in an Electoral College tie.

   To break the tie, Hayes made a deal with several southern states: if they cast their votes for him, he would remove Union troops from South Carolina, Florida, and Louisiana.

  Those troops safeguarded the effort by former Black slaves in the 11 states of the Confederacy experiencing political and economic advances during post-Civil War Reconstruction.

   The states agreed to the deal in early 1877. The troops were removed, and the KKK and Democratic politicians in the South began to sabotage Reconstruction.

    This subjugation was solidified by the Supreme Court’s Plessy vs. Ferguson ruling which allowed states to impose racial segregation and dismantle any voting and economic rights Black people had acquired after Emancipation.

        Advance the clock to 2020.

There is nothing legally or politically that today’s more progressive version of the Democratic Party can do   to stop the Republican-controlled Senate from approving Amy Coney Barrett as President Trump’s third appointee to the U.S. Supreme Court.

        Liberal advocates fear her appointment would  help conservatives of the Court turn back the clock on the civil rights advances imposed over the past half-century.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

This would be  equal to the 1877 Hayes deal.

    Ruth Bader Ginsburg died last week.

Democrats believe the GOP-controlled Senate

should not consider Trump’s replacement for her

because the Senate did not consider President Barack Obama’s nomination to replace Associate Justice Antonia Scalia who died in February 2016, before that year’s election.

This was a wish Ginsburg made on her death bed, according to her niece.

      If not, civil rights groups say a Trump appointee will create a 6-3 conservative bloc that can make decisions which will dismantle or weaken civil rights, related to race, gender, electoral and economic protections for

African Americans and other marginalized groups.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

You may find these interesting

Hampton Roads Community News

By Jaylen Scott Winter Intern New Journal and Guide PORTSMOUTH The Hampton Roads Community Health Center held a grand opening of their new building,...

Hampton Roads Community News

NORFOLK A group of more than 30 Hampton Roads-area pastors and ministers recently announced their support for the candidacy of Delegate Angelia Williams Graves...

Black Arts and Culture

By Leonard E. Colvin Chief Reporter New Journal and Guide On December 1, 1955, Rosa Parks resisted a  bus driver’s order to give up...

Black History

By Rosaland Tyler Associate Editor New Journal and Guide Sheer necessity pushed African Americans to organize the 1917 NAACP Silent Protest Parade in New...

Copyright © 2023 The New Journal and Guide. Design by Holobyte

Exit mobile version